Feed aggregator
Before the Stone Age: Were the first tools made from plants not rocks?
Before the Stone Age: Were the first tools made from plants not rocks?
Satellites can now spot plastic trash on Earth's beaches from space (photo)
Devastating floods in Spain witnessed by satellites
Torrential rainfall causing deadly flash floods has hit southern and eastern Spain in regions including the Costa del Sol, where the city of Malaga is located, and Valencia in the east. As these areas struggle to cope with the aftermath, satellite technology has played a crucial role in assessing the damages of the affected areas.
The article is being updated as new satellite images become available.
How Many Additional Exoplanets are in Known Systems?
One thing we’ve learned in recent decades is that exoplanets are surprisingly common. So far, we’ve confirmed nearly 6,000 planets, and we have evidence for thousands more. Most of these planets were discovered using the transit method. though we there are other methods as well. Many stars are known to have multiple planets, such as the TRAPPIST-1 system with seven Earth-sized worlds. But even within known planetary systems there could be planets we’ve overlooked. Perhaps their orbit doesn’t pass in front of the star from our vantage point, or the evidence of their presence is buried in data noise. How might we find them? A recent paper on the arXiv has an interesting approach.
Rather than combing through the observational data trying to extract more planets from the noise, the authors suggest that we look at the orbital dynamics of known systems to see if planets might be possible between the planets we know. Established systems are millions or billions of years old, so their planetary orbits must be stable on those timescales. If the planets of a system are “closely packed,” then adding new planets to the mix would cause the system to go all akilter. If the system is “loosely packed,” then we could add hypothetical planets between the others, and the system would still be dynamically stable.
The seven planetary systems considered. Credit: Horner, et alTo show how this would work, the authors consider seven planetary systems discovered by the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) known to have two planets. Since it isn’t likely that a system has only two planets, there is a good chance they have others. The team then ran thousands of simulations of these systems with hypothetical planets, calculating if they could remain stable over millions of years. They found that for two of the systems, extra planets (other than planets much more distant than the known ones) could be ruled out on dynamical grounds. Extra planets would almost certainly destabilize the systems. But five of the systems could remain stable with more planets. That doesn’t mean those systems have more planets, only that they could.
One of the things this work shows is that most of the currently known exoplanetary systems likely have yet-undiscovered worlds. This approach could also help us sort systems to determine which ones might deserve a further look. We are still in the early stages of discovery, and we are gathering data with incredible speed. We need tools like this so we aren’t overwhelmed by piles of new data.
Reference: Horner, Jonathan, et al. “The Search for the Inbetweeners: How packed are TESS planetary systems?” arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.00245 (2024).
The post How Many Additional Exoplanets are in Known Systems? appeared first on Universe Today.
Newfound dead star spins record-breaking 716 times a second, explodes with thermonuclear blasts
Dazzling images illuminate research on cardiovascular disease
Dazzling images illuminate research on cardiovascular disease
3D printing with light and sound could let us copy human organs
3D printing with light and sound could let us copy human organs
'Vega continues to be unusual:' Lack of planets around young star puzzles astronomers
From Campus to Cosmos: NASA Grants Boost Student, University Innovation
5 min read
Preparations for Next Moonwalk Simulations Underway (and Underwater) Nicholas Bitner from Candeska Cikana Community College, left, and Jesse Rhoades from the University of North Dakota (UND), right, are pictured in UND’s BiPed lab, where their students test and capture motion data for the Mapi Hapa. Walter Criswell, UND TodayHuman exploration on the lunar surface is no small feat. It requires technologists and innovators from all walks of life to tackle many challenges, including feet.
From designing astronaut boots, addressing hazardous Moon dust, and researching new ways to land on Mars, NASA is funding valuable research through M-STAR (Minority University Research and Education Project’s (MUREP) Space Technology Artemis Research). The M-STAR program provides opportunities for students and faculty at Minority Serving Institutions to participate in space technology development through capacity building and research grants. With more than $11.5 million awarded since 2020, M-STAR aims to ensure NASA isn’t leaving any potential solution behind.
Best Foot Forward Candeska Cikana Community College uses selective laser sintering, a type of 3D-printing in which heat and pressure form specific structures using layers of powdered material. Shown here, a student works to remove excess material, in this case a powdered form of nylon with carbon fibers, to reveal a prototype of the “Mapi Hapa,” or “sky shoe.” Candeska Cikana Community CollegeSupportive boots are required for astronauts who will perform long duration Artemis missions on the Moon. With astronaut foot health in mind, students and faculty of North Dakota’s Candeska Cikana Community College in Fort Totten and the University of North Dakota in Grand Forks are designing a solution for extravehicular activity Moon boots. The project, called Mapi Hapa, proposes a 3D printed device that helps astronauts achieve the range of motion that takes place in the ankle when you draw your toe back towards the shin.
Candeska Cikana Community College is a tribal college that serves the Spirit Lake Nation, including the Dakota, Lakota, Sisseton, Wahpeton, and Yanktonai peoples.
Nicholas Bitner, an instructor at Candeska Cikana and graduate student at the University of North Dakota, notes the unique skills that tribal students possess. “Their perspective, which is unlike that of any other student body, thrives on building with their hands and taking time to make decisions.”
Bitner also attributes many opportunities and successes of their program to M-STAR and its partnership which exemplifies the dire importance of consistent funding.
“Given the relationships, we have been able to expand our capabilities and our lab, but it has also given us funding. We were able to hire all our students in the engineering department as lab technicians. So, they get paid to do the research that they are a part of, and not only do they have that psychological ownership, but they also have a good paying job that looks nice on their resumes.”
In addition to addressing astronaut foot health, M-STAR funding is helping develop solutions to combat lunar regolith, or Moon dust, which can damage landers, spacesuits, and human lungs, if inhaled.
Lunar Dust DevelopmentWith M-STAR, New Mexico State University in Las Cruces developed affordable, reliable lunar regolith simulants to help test lunar surface technologies. The team also designed testing facilities that mimic environmental conditions on the Moon.
New Mexico State has already started sharing their simulants, including with a fellow M-STAR awardee. An M-STAR project selected in 2023 from the University of Maryland Eastern Shore in Princess Anne uses the simulants to help test their experience in smart agriculture to test applications for crop production on the Moon.
University of Maryland, Eastern Shore explores the possibility of growing crops in lunar regolith by mixing varying proportions of lunar regolith simulant, horse manure, and potting soil. The lunar regolith simulant was provided by fellow M-STAR awardee at New Mexico State University in in Las Cruces.Stephanie Yeldell/NASADouglas Cortez, associate professor in civil engineering at New Mexico State, believes different perspectives are essential to maximizing solutions.
“There are hundreds of people working at Minority Serving Institutions that are used to looking at the world in a completely different way,” said Cortez. “When they start looking at the same problem and parameters, they come up with very different solutions.”
As we look to sustainable presence on the Moon, NASA also has its sights set on Mars and M-STAR is helping develop technologies to inform crewed Martian exploration.
Stick the LandingSan Diego State University in California was awarded funding for research on Mars entry, descent, and landing technologies. The team aims to achieve optimal trajectory by developing onboard algorithms that guide vehicles to descent autonomously.
The M-STAR research opportunities have been invaluable to students like Chris Davami and his teammates working to develop improved methods to land on Mars.
Christopher Davami, who supported San Diego State University’s 2021 M-STAR project, is pictured here at NASA’s Langley Research Center, where he was selected for internships supporting research in aeroelasticity, atmospheric flight, and entry systems research.NASA“I would definitely not have been able to have these opportunities with NASA if it weren’t for M-STAR,” said Davami. “M-STAR helped pay for my education, which helped me save a lot in student loans. I probably wouldn’t be going to graduate school right now if I did not have this opportunity. This program enabled me to keep pursuing my research and continue doing what I love.”
Following his contributions to the M-STAR-funded project, Davami was awarded a NASA Space Technology Graduate Research Opportunity in 2023 on his work in autonomous end-to-end trajectory planning and guidance constrained entry and precision power decent.
Through efforts like M-STAR, NASA aims to seed the future workforce and prepare colleges and universities to win other NASA research opportunities. When it comes to the advancement of space technology, people of different backgrounds and skillsets are needed to achieve what was once known as impossible. Not only can the diversification of ideas spark fundamental innovations in space, but it can also help students apply these technological advancements to solving problems here on Earth.
To learn more about M-STAR visit:
by: Gabrielle Thaw, NASA’s Space Technology Mission Directorate
Facebook logo @NASATechnology @NASA_Technology Keep Exploring Discover More Topics From NASASpace Technology Mission Directorate
Student & STEM Opportunities
NASA Grants to Strengthen Diversity in Engineering, STEM Fields
Get Involved
Share Details Last Updated Nov 05, 2024 EditorLoura Hall Related TermsSharp 'lobster vision:' China's Einstein Probe space telescope already making discoveries during commissioning phase
Natural fibres in wet wipes may actually be worse for soil and animals
Natural fibres in wet wipes may actually be worse for soil and animals
These Bird Nests Show Signs of an Architectural ‘Culture’
Culture may play a role in how birds build collectively in the Kalahari Desert
Save $300 on the HTC VIVE Pro 2 VR headset, the best high-resolution option
Asteroid-mining company AstroForge gets 1st-ever FCC license for commercial deep-space mission
Hubble and Webb are the Dream Team. Don't Break Them Up
Many people think of the James Webb Space Telescope as a sort of Hubble 2. They understand that the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) has served us well but is now old, and overdue for replacement. NASA seems to agree, as they have not sent a maintenance mission in over fifteen years, and are already preparing to wind down operations. But a recent paper argues that this is a mistake. Despite its age, HST still performs extremely well and continues to produce an avalanche of valuable scientific results. And given that JWST was never designed as a replacement for HST — it is an infrared (IR) telescope) — we would best be served by operating both telescopes in tandem, to maximize coverage of all observations.
Let’s not fool ourselves: the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) is old, and is eventually going to fall back to Earth. Although it was designed to be repairable and upgradable, there have been no servicing missions since 2009. Those missions relied on the Space Shuttle, which could capture the telescope and provide a working base for astronauts. Servicing missions could last weeks, and only the Space Shuttle could transport the six astronauts to the telescope and house them for the duration of the mission.
Without those servicing missions, failing components can no longer be replaced, and the overall health of HST will keep declining. If nothing is done, HST will eventually stop working altogether. To avoid it becoming just another piece of space junk, plans are already being developed to de-orbit it and send it crashing into the Pacific Ocean. But that’s no reason to give up on it. It still has as clear a view of the cosmos as ever, and mission scientists are doing an excellent job of working around technical problems as they arise.
The James Webb Space Telescope was launched into space on Christmas dat in 2021. Its system of foldable hexagonal mirrors give it an effective diameter some 2.7 times larger than HST, and it is designed to see down into the mid-IR range. Within months of deployment, it had already seen things that clashed with existing models of how the Universe formed, creating a mini-crisis in some fields and leading unscrupulous news editors to write headlines questioning whether the “Big Bang Theory” was under threat!
This image of NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope was taken on May 19, 2009 after deployment during Servicing Mission 4. NASAThe reason JWST was able to capture such ancient galaxies is that it is primarily an IR telescope: As the Universe expands, photons from distant objects get red-shifted until stars that originally shone in visible light can now only be seen in the IR. But these IR views are proving extremely valuable in other scientific fields apart from cosmology. In fact, many of the most striking images released by JWST’s press team are IR images of familiar objects, revealing hidden complexities that had not been seen before.
This is a key difference between the two telescopes: While HST’s range overlaps slightly with JWST, it can see all the way up into ultraviolet (UV) wavelengths. HST was launched in 1990, seven years late and billions of dollars over budget. Its 2.4 meter primary element needed to be one of the most precisely ground mirrors ever made, because it was intended to be diffraction limited at UV wavelengths. Famously, avoidable problems in the testing process led to it being very precisely figured to a slightly wrong shape, leading to spherical aberration preventing it from coming to sharp focus.
Fortunately the telescope was designed from the start to be serviceable, and even returned to Earth for repairs by the Space Shuttle if necessary. In the end though, NASA opticians were able to design and build a set of corrective optics to solve the problem, and the COSTAR system was installed by astronauts on the first servicing mission. Over the years, NASA sent up three more servicing missions, to upgrade or repair components, and install new instruments.
Illustration of NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope. Credits: NASAHST could be one of the most successful scientific instruments ever built. Since 1990, it has been the subject of approximately 1200 science press releases, each of which was read more than 400 million times. The more than 46,000 scientific papers written using HST data have been cited more than 900,000 times! And even in its current degraded state, it still provided data for 1435 papers in 2023 alone.
JWST also ran over time and over budget, but had a far more successful deployment. Despite having a much larger mirror, with more than six times the collecting area of HST, the entire observatory only weighs half as much as HST. Because of its greater sensitivity, and the fact that it can see ancient light redshifted into IR wavelengths, it can see far deeper into the Universe than HST. It is these observations, of galaxies formed when the Universe was extremely young (100 – 180 million years), that created such excitement shortly after it was deployed.
As valuable as these telescopes are, they will not last forever. JWST is located deep in space, some 1.5 million kilometers from Earth near the L2 Lagrange point. When it eventually fails, it will become just another piece of Solar System debris orbiting the Sun in the vast emptiness of the Solar System. HST, however, is in Low Earth Orbit (LEO), and suffers very slight amounts of drag from the faint outer reaches of the atmosphere. Over time it will gradually lose speed, drifting downwards until it enters the atmosphere proper and crashes to Earth. Because of its size, it will not burn up completely, and large chunks will smash into the surface.
Because it cannot be predicted where exactly it will re-enter, mission planners always intended to capture it with the Space Shuttle and return it to Earth before this happened. Its final resting place was supposed to be in display in a museum, but unfortunately the shuttle program was cancelled. The current plan is to send up an uncrewed rocket which will dock with the telescope (a special attachment was installed on the final servicing mission for this purpose), and deorbit it in a controlled way to ensure that its pieces land safely in the ocean.
You can find the original paper at https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.01187
The post Hubble and Webb are the Dream Team. Don't Break Them Up appeared first on Universe Today.